Making Deliberative Democracy Practical: Public Consultation and Dispute Resolution
نویسنده
چکیده
Deliberative democracy is a form of alternative dispute resolution. Consulting the public in a thoughtful and representative way can lead to consequential public policy outcomes that might otherwise have been difficult to achieve. However, some recent literature appears to treat deliberative democracy and alternative dispute resolution as rivals.! While there are differences in emphasis and in theoretical preoccupations between the two, there are also some overlapping aims and methods. In this article I will fIrst consider methods to consult the public and discuss some criteria that might be applied to distinguish among these methods. I will argue that there are good reasons to favor an approach anchored in deliberative democracy. Second, I will offer some ways of distinguishing deliberative democracy from other democratic approaches. Third, I will respond to some of the confusing claims at issue between deliberative democracy and alternative dispute resolution. Finally, I will discuss a particular policy area to illustrate how deliberative democracy can have a demonstrable impact. Using that illustration, I will show how some of the practices common in alternative dispute resolution fInd a natural ally in the deliberative democracy approach.
منابع مشابه
Community Engagement for Big Epidemiology: Deliberative Democracy as a Tool
Public trust is critical in any project requiring significant public support, both in monetary terms and to encourage participation. The research community has widely recognized the centrality of public trust, garnered through community consultation, to the success of large-scale epidemiology. This paper examines the potential utility of the deliberative democracy methodology within the public ...
متن کاملDeliberative future visioning: utilizing the deliberative democracy theory and practice in futures research
Broadly defined, deliberative democracy aspires the decision-making legitimacy by deliberation of equal citizens. As a response to the growing discontent with the representational governance, the normative and empirical development of the deliberative democracy theory addresses the increasing desiderata of public engagement beyond party politics and constituencies. Generating knowledge for the ...
متن کاملThe dialogic turn: dialogue for deliberation
The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes providing that: The full-text is not changed in any way A full bibliographic reference is made A hyperlink is given to the original metadata page in eResearch eResearch policies on access and re-use can be viewed on our Policies page: Much of current deb...
متن کاملDeliberative democracy in health care: current challenges and future prospects
Background There is a vast body of literature on deliberative, participative, or engaged democracy. In the area of health care there is a rapidly expanding literature on deliberative democracy as embodied in various notions of public engagement, shared decision-making (SDM), patient-centered care, and patient/care provider autonomy over the past few decades. It is useful to review such literatu...
متن کاملDeliberation by the People Themselves: Entry Points for the Public Voice
Deliberative democracy by the people themselves is a distinctive form of democratic practice. It can be distinguished from deliberative democracy practiced by elites or representatives as well as from other forms of democracy that do not emphasize deliberation. In this article I explore ways this kind of democracy can be realized and then inserted into our current democratic institutions. The i...
متن کامل